Monday, 15 September 2014

Actress Daniele Watts's horrific suffering at the hands of California police had me in tears - especially what she wrote afterwards


According to Ms Watts, who starred in Django Unchained, she was questioned by California police after being seen kissing her white husband in the street. According to the actress, the police suspected her of being a prostitute. (She also claims that her arm was cut when they handcuffed her - oh, the horror!) They let her go after a few minutes. What she wrote and posted about the incident afterwards is a classic of its kind, and certainly puts the suffering of aid workers and journalists being beheaded by savages in Iraq into context:

As I was sitting in the back of the police car, I remembered the countless times my father came home frustrated or humiliated by the cops when he had done nothing wrong. I felt his shame, his anger, and my own feelings of frustration for existing in a world where I have allowed myself to believe that “authority figures” could control my BEING… my ability to BE!!!!!!! 
I was sitting in that back of this cop car, filled with adrenaline, my wrist bleeding in pain, and it occurred to me, that even there, I STILL HAD POWER OVER MY OWN SPIRIT! 
Those cops could not stop me from expressing myself. They could not stop the cathartic tears and rage from flowing out of me. They could not force me to feel bad about myself. Yes, they had control over my physical body, but not my emotions. My feelings. My spirit was, and still is FREE. 
I will continue to look any “authority figure” in the eye without fear. NO POLICE OFFICER OR GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL IS MORE POWERFUL THAN ME. WE ARE EQUALS. I KNOW THAT I WILL ALWAYS BE FREE BECAUSE THAT IS THE NATURE OF MY SPIRIT. 
And moreover, I deeply enjoyed connecting with the cops who detained me. I allowed myself to be honest about my anger, frustration, and rage as tears flowed from my eyes. The tears I cry for a country that calls itself "the land of the free and the home of the brave" and yet detains people for claiming that very right. 
Today I exist with courage, knowing that I am blessed to have experienced what I did today. All of those feelings, no matter how uncomfortable. These feelings are what builds my internal strength, my ability to grow through WHATEVER may happen to me. 
That internal knowing is what guides me in this world. Not the law, not fear, not mistrust of government or cops or anything else. 
In this moment there is a still small voice whispering to me. It says: You are love. You are free. You are pure.

So remember - if you ever find yourself being questioned by a policeman and find yourself crying tears for a country that calls itself England, just keep telling yourself: "You are love. You are free. You are pure." Alternatively, you could just answer their questions, receive an apology for having been bothered, and get on with your life. The choice is yours.

5 comments:

  1. I think Ms Watts should contact Russell Brand; they seem to share a similarly deranged view of life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or maybe it's the rest of us who are mad. Did you ever consider that possibility?

      Anyway, remember - You are love. You are free. You are pure.

      I certainly intend to from now on.

      Delete
  2. Unless I have been misinformed, the gentleman in question was not her husband and she was doing rather more than merely kissing him, Apparently the old bill had been summoned by local office workers far from pleased by the spectacle.

    Why is it that when these stories are fully explored A/ they rarely stand up to the liberal media's version and B/ are never corrected by same?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suppose it depends what exactly was being kissed. Actually, I'm not sure I want to think about that.

      No need for a correction - it's obvious from the photo of the large, heavily-muscled white policeman looming menacingly over his terrified black victim that this is an example of unalloyed racism. And even if the picture and the accompanying story aren't precisely "true" in the sense that they fit the facts, they undoubtedly embody a deeper, more important truth - i.e. they reflect the prejudices of the newspaper's editor (the so-called Piers Morgan defence).

      Delete
    2. Yes, the 'truthiness' shines through. Facts are for conservatives anyway.

      Delete