The headline measure in the new legislation will be to
increase the maximum penalty from 14 years to life. Big deal – most prisoners
with a life sentence are up for parole within 10 to 15 years in any case.
Surely the main problem is catching those guilty of enslaving people, getting a conviction in court, and appointing judges who will dish out the maximum sentence available.
Another main aim of the bill is to “consolidate” the large
number of existing offences into a single act. And this makes a difference how
exactly? I’m far from being a legal expert, but does this really amount to
anything more than administrative twiddling? Does it matter in which act an
offence is enshrined as long as it exists somewhere?
Finally, inevitably, the act allows for the creation of an
anti-slavery commissioner who would hold the constituent parts of the criminal
justice system to account. What puzzles me is why the CJS should need this sort of encouragement (or, if your prefer, bullying). Don’t the police and the courts want to catch, convict and imprison
criminals? Are they now as relaxed about slavery as they are about, say,
shop-lifting? If so, why? I suppose they’re far too busy tracking down those
dangerous villains responsible for posting off-colour jokes about Nelson
Mandela on social networks to deal with those who deprive others of their
freedom.
I particularly enjoyed two points made today by the Home
Secretary. First she felt it necessary to assure us that "the victim is at
the heart of what we're doing". Despite some evidence to the
contrary, I think we all rather assume that the reason we have laws and police
and courts and suchlike is to protect the innocent from the guilty, rather than
the other way round. Or have I got this wrong?
According to a review carried out by the Labour MP Frank
Field some 10,000 people are currently enslaved in the UK (leaving aside
tax-payers, of course). But on the Today Programme this morning, Mrs. May admitted
that she doesn’t have a clue if that figure is accurate. So why is she
bothering to introduce new legislation regarding sentencing policy when the
real problem is evidently detection?
The answer to that last question is simple: as passing laws
is what governments are designed to do, that’s what they concentrate on doing. In
2010, for instance, 3,506 new laws were passed - 13.5 for every working day.
This ensures humungous quantities of frenzied make-work activity by ministers
and civil servants and lawyers whose main purpose is to convince themselves and
the electorate that they’re actually doing something useful – which, of course,
they aren’t.
There are many things wrong with this country: a lack of laws isn't one of them.
No comments:
Post a Comment