Model 127 brogues |
According to the BBC, Egyptians voting in their
country’s first democratic elections (whose outcome, one assumes, will merely prove that
democracy isn’t always and everywhere a Good Thing), have been “shoeing” some
of the candidates (and I really hope the word doesn’t also stand for some
unpleasant and probably extremely painful sexual activity):
“…protesters in Cairo threw shoes and stones at a convoy of
candidate Ahmed Shafiq, who was Mr Mubarak's last prime minister…”
I know that in several cultures simply exposing
the sole of one’s shoe is considered insulting (even if you have no idea
that you’re giving offence – but, hey, Westerners are supposed to know this
stuff, right?: we are such bastards!).
Even bringing up the subject of shoes while having an Arabic argument is
considered inflammatory (You have a face like a shoe! Your shoes are unpolished! Your mother was a camel and your father was a cobbler! Shoe off!). So, obviously, throwing your shoe at someone is a token
of deep contempt.
I can also see that shoes serve as handy symbolic weapons. A
flung shoe won’t kill anyone, so you’re unlikely to spend the rest of your life
living off cockroaches in some grossly insanitary Third World dungeon, or end
up having your foot lopped off with a scimitar by some hirsute brute in a string vest. They also obviate the need for
smuggling potential missiles into public meetings. And, of course, eggs and
tomatoes are probably a bit thin on the ground in some non-oil rich Arab
countries.
But, as the title of this post hints, my real concern is whether unarrested shoe-bungers ever get their shoes back. Otherwise, the
walk home must be extremely uncomfortable – and possibly dangerous, especially
if they’re in the middle of an angry mob. Having been called a clumsy fool on
more than one occasion for stepping on people’s feet (my standard response is
“Sorry – didn’t see you down there”) I know how easy it is to manglesomeone’s
toes – I hate to think what state they’d have been in if they hadn't been wearing shoes.
This has been worrying me ever since George Bush dodged that
shoe back in 2008. Here, fortunately, it's too wet and cold and shoes are too expensive for it ever to catch on.
Two interesting facts: the Turkish shoe company which
manufactured the journalist’s shoes immediately quadrupled sales. And the journo in question was himself shoed by an exiled Iraqi journalist the following year in Paris. As it were.
Waste of good shoes, I'd say! I was never a great fan of George Bush, but I did think that was one of his better moments, dodging those two shoes!
ReplyDeleteShoes in the Arab tradition should be light,easily removed for the ritual washing of feet five times a day before prayer-Dr.Martins they ain't,and in case there is a bit of a mix-up,or a light-fingered one amongst the faithful after said prayer,it would be unwise to wear yer best John Lobbs.
Deleteso throwing or lobbing (sorry) your shoes is of little consequence as they would be unlikely to have much value and would probably remain unreturned.