Rare sighting |
Self-serving tosh, of course.
Weigh pointed to last year’s Operation Julius, which was
designed to tackle what he called “burglary spikes”, claiming that he would no
longer have enough men to mount such operations. But the reason cities suffered
from increases in certain types of crime before any cuts took effect is
twofold: police weren’t out on the streets in the first place, and our criminal
justice system is useless when it comes to dealing effectively with criminals. In other words, the police aren’t in the right place to deter criminals, and the courts vomit
vermin back out on the streets because they don’t have enough prison places
to house them (or because the judge or magistrate is a self-pleasuring liberal nincompoop).
The answer is simple: abolish the foreign aid budget and
spend the money on new prisons, and send all unformed officers out on patrol
within five minutes of the start of their shift (as happens in American cities).
The reason the police spend so much time cowering behind
desks isn’t hard to figure out. Pounding pavements is unpleasant and
potentially dangerous because they’re now packed with criminals. The streets
are packed with criminals because the police gave up patrolling them decades
ago. Paperwork is just an excuse – a self-inflicted burden which any
half-competent administrator could get under control within a matter of weeks.
If the police themselves wanted to cut back on paperwork, they would. There was
a recent report that Greater Manchester Police were taking up to 80 minutes to
fill out a single holiday request form. This is not “political correctness gone
mad” form-mania – this is an example of bureaucratic incompetence. And of
course, it requires the collusion of the police themselves – they evidently like
the system just the way it is.
Crime levels (at least, the sort of crime that matters to most of us - burglary, mugging, vandalism) and police levels bear little relation to each other. In 2010, before any funding cuts, only 11% of police officers were available for front-line policing. In 2011, after forty years of inexorably rising police budgets, 25% of the public said they never saw a police officer on patrol. That's disgraceful! It’s what you do with the police at your
disposal that counts, not the amount of money you have to spend on them.
What’s evidently lacking is the will to change anything.
Is there anyone out there – apart from criminals – who
doesn’t want to see more police patrolling our streets? Anyone at all? You at
the back, sir. No, this isn’t the Police Training Workshop on Interfacing Sensitively with the Transgender Community – that’s next door. Would you like
someone to help you drag your enormous, wobbling arse out of your chair and
help you out of the room. Perhaps you'd like them to carry your king-size carton of donuts, bucket of non-diet Coke and that
stack of paperwork in case anyone tries to steal them. Happy to help!
As I was asking, does anyone NOT want more police patrolling
their streets? We had a little flurry of rozzer activity around our area about a year
back, but that only lasted a week or two, and now the police are warning us
that local car crime’s on the rise. Thanks for letting us know! I go for a
fairly lengthy stroll or bike ride around our neighbourhood at least once a day.
Apart from the area near the police station on our local high street, I have
not seen a single beat cop – either a real one or one of those pretend
community ones – for months. Last night, one of my son’s friends was mugged a
few hundred yards from our house by a thug on a bike (white by the way - I'm an equal opportunities complainer), who will never be caught. Happens all the
time. And it’ll go on happening while senior officers like Chris Weigh whine about
funding and refuse to face up to the real problem, which is that what he and his ilk call
“visible policing” is simply too much of a fag to bother with any more.
On 15th November this year, the people of England
and Wales get to vote for independent police commissioners who are supposed to
tailor local policing to the needs of their area rather than to centralised
Home office diktats. On paper, this is a great idea: in practice, it won't change a thing. Turn-out will be pitifully low, some extremists will get in (along with
some total idiots – for example, John Prescott will be standing for the post in
Hull).
People won’t vote because they know that, ultimately, it
won’t make a blind bit of difference – no matter what we the public want, no matter who we vote for, no matter how much money is made available to them, the police will remain firmly ensconsed
behind their desks, munching donuts and filling out forms.
Just think how much we used to revere them. All very sad.
Just to make a general point. Arthur Rubinstein, Chopin intrepreter and Sir Tom Jones look-alike, once remarked that a good cigar was like a good woman. Both need constant attention otherwise they go out.
ReplyDeletePosts and comments? Our great Blogmeister- General is not bothering to reply to his fan-base? Worrying development.