Monday 22 November 2010

Always ask: who has the most to gain by keeping a big problem alive?

Earlier, I wrote about the reasons for the ongoing existence of an underclass in a comparatively rich and decidedly left-wing country such as ours. I concluded that it’s because the people dependent on the underclass’s continued existence fight any concerted effort to turn their clients into responsible members of society.

Of course, the same principle applies to many of the world’s most intractable problems.

If the Palestinians weren’t such a useful cause for various Middle East fascists to rally round, and if they weren’t such an effective stick with which to beat the Americans and their representatives in the region,  the Israelis, the problem would be dealt with as equitably as possible, given the circumstances (to give that wise old Irish response to a request for directions – “Well, I wouldn’t start from here”). 

Islamo-fascists, Europe’s ruling liberal elite, assorted psychopaths who enjoy randomly slaughtering innocent people, Muslims who just can’t get enough of massacring local Christians, your standard-issue anti-semite, your basic Troskyist anti-capitalism “demonstrator” and his respectable, useful-idiot, middle class “ooh aren’t we daring” supporters, your left-wing Western media commentators and reporters – in fact, anyone who just can’t wait to see Uncle Sam and his few remaining friends humbled and neutered (as if Barack Obama wasn’t doing the job for them) – simply don’t want the problem solved. 

Let’s be brutally honest – very few of these people give a damn about the Palestinians: they’re using the situation for purposes which are irrelevant to the vast majority of Palestinians. 

Would Northern Ireland have remained such an expensive, nagging, infected tooth of a problem if various communistic working-class gangster psychopaths hadn’t enjoyed the opportunities afforded for indiscriminate violence and money-making, plus the lure of dressing up in pseudo-uniforms and balaclavas and cool shades and posing with guns? 

And wasn’t it a thrillingly immediate, unremote cause for democracy-hating British lefties to support? And as for silly, rich Americans whose ancestors had been forced to flee during the potato famine: didn’t giving money to murdering scum furnish them with a grand sense of purpose and give them a chance to reconnect with their ancient, tear-inducing  roots – sure and begorrah, weren’t they just like that black fellow in that swell TV series, that Kunta Kinte guy? 

Northern Ireland became yet another cause allowing irrelevant people to satisfy a variety of entirely unrelated political and psychological imperatives.  

The whole Global Warming swindle falls into the category of “problems” being kept alive artificially because of vested interests. The exposure of this vast scientific hoax would lead to thousands – tens of thousands – of scientists, politicians, pressure groups and journalists across the globe with nothing to do, and no money to do it with. We now know it’s a con. Theyknow it’s a con (though it must be hard to admit it, especially to themselves). But too many people have based whole careers on pretending it’s a genuine problem for them or the media to put up their hands and admit they either made a teensy-weensy little mistake, or that they’ve been deliberately lying by falsifying evidence to fool us all into thinking they’ve actually got a case, and that to expect the world to spend trillions of pounds to solve a problem that simply doesn’t exist just so they can carry on drawing a salary would be grotesquely immoral.

Whenever they come across a seemingly intractable global issue, our fearless liberal media automatically parks its brain in neutral, seeks out those very  people with the most to gain from perpetuating the problem, believe everything they’re told, then hand over their their notebook, saying, “Please, just write down exactly what you want me to say”. When they come across disinterested, knowledgeable  people telling the unvarnished truth, they immediately classify them as  lying bastards, and disbelieve every word they say. (Just look at how our media has treated  Eurosceptics over the years - the very people whom recent events in Ireland have proved utterly, completely and totally right.) 

All very odd!

Luckily, those of us who don’t work for the liberal media (any more, in my case) aren’t quite so naïve - or so intellectually lazy.

2 comments:

  1. Psychoanalysts manage to extend their treatments indefinitely. Is that a clinical exigency? Or an economic one.

    Broad-minded, I listened to a programme on Radio 4 once, about the British drug addiction business. The cure can go on for months. Or years. Or forever. It has to. What else would the doctors do?

    When I trained as a management consultant, beginning 1981, the first lesson was that you had to work yourself out of a job, solve the client's problem so that you aren't needed any more. I think the weak point in that business model has been spotted and fixed now. Is it £2 billion a year the British government pays for consultancy? Or £20 billion? What's the difference? The only thing you can be sure of is that nothing will be fixed.

    Old joke. Bill Clinton, recently inaugurated, is being shown round Washington, to see how the civil service "works", and he's in the Department of Agriculture. He is led down a long corridor by his minders, endless lines of doors on either side, each with a name on, all silent as the grave, until they get to one door with the sound of uncontrollable sobbing coming from behind it. They go in and ask the civil servant what the problem is. Choking back the tears, he finally manages to say "my farmer died".
    Monday, November 22, 2010 - 09:25 PM

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very true, DM.The thing that really shocked me working as a consultant on a few government projects was how the whole concept of consultancy had been perverted by the civil service (and the consultants). No longer does it entail a group or individual being parachuted in to solve an single, identifiable problem within a fixed time and at a fixed cost (although I'm glad to say this described what I was doing). Instead, a single project now seems to act as a Trojan horse which allows the consultancy to infiltrate any number of their own employees into key positions on a semi-permanent basis – charging the sort of per diem rates you’d normally charge for a project lasting a few days. The consultants end up doing the jobs that civil servants used to do – but at a grotesquely higher cost. Meanwhile, the civil servants keep their jobs, only now it mainly consists of keeping a vague eye on how the consultants are doing their work for them. As a consultant, I should have found this situation agreeable – or, at least, should have identified it as an opportunity – but I found it utterly sickening. As you say, there’s nothing to stop consultants in the public sector writing their own cheques – at our expense. It is a national scandal.
    Wednesday, December 1, 2010 - 11:02 PM

    ReplyDelete